Planning and Development Council

That this meeting proceed into a Committee of the Whole session.

That the confidential report from the Legal Department dated September 21, 2011 be received.

That the report (PD-067-11) and comments from the public with respect to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications (24T-06004/1413 and Z.1413.20) submitted by Kilbarry Holdings Corporation, be received. 2. That the application Z.1413.20, submitted by Kilbarry Holdings Corporation, be approved. 3. That Zoning By-law 2011-109 be passed. 4. That the Director of Planning Services be authorized to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision (24T-06004/1413) submitted by Kilbarry Holdings Corporation, prepared by Bousfields Inc., dated June 28, 2011, subject to the conditions contained in Appendix “A” of staff report PD-067-11.

That report PD-074-11 regarding the proposed telecommunications facilities protocol be received. 2. That the draft Telecommunications Facilities Protocol (attached as Appendix E to this report) be adopted on an interim basis as amended as follows: all instances of “ Letter(s) of Municipal Concurrence ” and “ Municipal Concurrence ” be deleted and replaced with, “ Municipal Letter of Concurrence on Facility Design and Public Consultation (“Municipal Letter of Concurrence”) ”; the setback for telecommunications facilities from any sensitive land use in Sections 3.2 a), 3.4.2 and 6.1.1 of the draft Telecommunications Facilities Protocol be increased to 200 metres; a calculation of radiofrequency radio exposure measured at the nearest sensitive land use be added to the complete application contents of Section 4.2 as a new subsection (i); and the first sentence of Section 6.2.8 be deleted and replaced with, “ Where signage is proposed to be attached to any telecommunications facility: ”. 3. That the fee for issuing a Municipal Letter of Concurrence on Facility Design and Public Consultation be set at $5,000. 4. That staff undertake consultation and report back to Council on any further amendments at a later date.

That the document titled “Bronte Village Heritage Resources Review and Strategy”, dated September 2011, be received as information; and 2. That the following recommendations contained within the document titled “Bronte Heritage Resources Review and Strategy”, dated September 2011, be endorsed: a. That this study be used as a reference tool and as a guide for managing heritage conservation in Bronte Village; b. That the general conservation strategies outlined in Section 4.0 of this report be implemented by staff; c. That a public information meeting be held in Bronte to discuss heritage preservation and planning tools; d. That surveys be made available to collect feedback regarding support for a heritage conservation district and/or alternative planning tools; and e. That a report be brought back to Council to present the feedback received from the public information meeting and surveys, and to present a final staff recommendation that reflects the community input.

That the proposed changes to the Halton Regional Report No. LPS59-11, as outlined in Appendix A of the report dated September 30, 2011 from the Economic Development Department, be endorsed and forwarded to Halton Region for consideration.

That the following recommendations pertaining to Items 6a, 6b and 6c, of the Heritage Oakville Advisory Committee minutes from its meeting on October 11, 2011, be approved and the remainder of the minutes be received: 6.a. Heritage Permit Application HP32/11-42.20R 236 Reynolds Street - Landscaping 1. That Heritage Permit Application HP32/11-42.20R for landscaping at 236 Reynolds Street, as attached in Appendix A to the report dated September 22, 2011 from Planning Services, be approved subject to confirmation from the Town Arborist that the asphalt will not have a negative impact on the existing town tree; 2. That any changes to the existing proposal which are considered by staff to be minor in nature be submitted to Planning Services (Heritage) for final approval; and 3. That this heritage permit expire two years from the date of final approval by Council. b. Heritage Permit Application HP30/11-42.20L 392 Lakeshore Road East - Alterations to roof and door 1. That Heritage Permit Application HP30/11-42.20L for alterations to the roof and a rear entranceway at 392 Lakeshore Road East, as attached in Appendix A to the report dated September 22, 2011 from Planning Services, be approved; 2. That any changes to the existing proposal which are considered by staff to be minor in nature be submitted to Planning Services (Heritage) for final approval, including the installation of dormers on the roof; and 3. That this heritage permit expire two years from the date of final approval b

That this Committee resolve into a closed meeting session for the purpose of dealing with a matter pertaining to litigation or potential litigation, including communications necessary for that purpose, with respect to Confidential Discussion Item C-2.

That this committee rise and report.

That the report and recommendations of the Committee of the Whole be approved.

That the following by-law(s) be passed: 2011-109 A by-law to amend the Town of Oakville’s Comprehensive Zoning By-law 1984-63, as amended to rezone the lands located north of River Oaks Boulevard and south of Glenashton Drive, west of Trafalgar Road to permit residential development and open space uses. (Kilbarry Holdings Corp., File: Z.1413.20). (Re: Item 1) 2011-121 A by-law to confirm the proceedings of a meeting of Council.