A/181/2017

That the appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board of Committee of Adjustment Decision CAV A/181/2017, 428 Samford Place, be confirmed; 2. That the Town Solicitor or his designate be authorized to pursue this appeal of COA Decision CAV A/181/2017 in accordance with the position set out in Appendix C attached to the report dated October 27, 2017 from the Legal department; 3. That in consultation with the Director of Planning or his designate, the Town Solicitor or his designate be authorized to negotiate a proposed settlement of the Appeal either before or at the Board Hearing in a manner that addresses the issues and concerns identified in Appendix C attached to the report dated October 27, 2017 from the Legal department.

That a Transfer Release and Abandonment of Easement HR1290642 be executed in accordance with By-law 2013-057.

That the assumption of a portion of Registered Plan 20M-657 be approved; and 2. That By-law 2017-121, a By-law to assume Oak Park Boulevard, the Stormwater Management Pond and Memorial Park within Plan 20M-657, be approved.

That comments from the public with respect to the Draft Plan of Subdivision application by Majestic Edge Estates Inc. (File No. 24T-17006/1718), be received.

That the Temporary Use By-law Extension application (File No. Z.1314.08) submitted by Medeiros Boat Works Ltd. be approved; and 2. That By-law 2017-117 to permit the lands to be used as a boat manufacturing and fabrication operation as a temporary use for a period of three years be passed.

That the report respecting the appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board of Committee of Adjustment Decision CAV A/181/2017, 428 Samford Place, be received. 2. That the Proposed Minutes of Settlement for the Appeal attached as Appendix B to the report be approved and the Town Solicitor or his designate be authorized to execute those Minutes of Settlement on behalf of the Town. 3. That the Committee of Adjustment Application fees be reimbursed for the Second Application to The Committee of Adjustment respecting the Revised Design and Reduced Variance Request as part of the approved Minutes of Settlement.

That comments from the public with respect to the town-initiated proposed Official Plan Amendments to the North Oakville East Secondary Plan and the North Oakville West Secondary Plan (File No. 42.15.56) be received.

That the report respecting the appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board of Committee of Adjustment Decision CAV A/181/2017, 1198 Cynthia Lane, be received. 2. That the Proposed Minutes of Settlement for the Appeal, attached as Appendix B to this report, be approved and the Town Solicitor or his designate be authorized to execute those Minutes of Settlement on behalf of the Town. 3. That the Committee of Adjustment Application fees be reimbursed for the Second Application to the Committee of Adjustment respecting the Revised Design and Reduced Variance Request as part of the approved Minutes of Settlement.

That the recommendation contained in the confidential New Business item dated March 19, 2018, be passed.

That the comments from the public with respect to the zoning by-law amendment application by IMH Queens Ltd., File No. Z.1513.28, be received. 2. That analysis of the following matters of interest to Council be included as part of the recommendation report: Concerns with respect to reductions in parking, this must be furthered considered. Staff should consider future development not just existing when dealing with traffic issues. Drawings should reflect the reduced setbacks. Confirm the Region has been consulted with respect to road needs and the proposed setbacks from Trafalgar Road. Could as of right designs be developed for Council to consider, to better understand massing? Consider traffic issues on Trafalgar Road resulting from the proposed development. Can the placement of an amenity space as part of the green roof be considered? Can an estimate be provided as to what percentage of massing the proposal provides versus as of right development? Does this over constitute overdevelopment, what is the planning justification given the impact, PJR, water, roads, parks, landscape setbacks and amenity space?