Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
Declared interests
Councillor Adamswith respect to Item 6.2 - Statutory Public Meeting – Town-initiated Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments – Four Dwelling Units Per Property and Sheridan College Housing Area (File No
What was decided (16 motions)
16 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
That this meeting proceed into a Committee of the Whole session.
Moved by Councillor Lishchyna, seconded by Councillor Longo
Carried
That a notice of intention to designate be issued under section 29, Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for the Daymond House at 2366 Carrington Place.
Moved by Councillor Duddeck
Carried
That a notice of intention to designate be issued under section 29, Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for the Cedar Lodge at 149 Dunn Street.
Moved by Councillor Duddeck
Carried
That a notice of intention to designate be issued under section 29, Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for the MacKendrick House at 2038 Lakeshore Road East.
Moved by Councillor Duddeck
Carried
That a notice of intention to designate be issued under section 29, Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for the Graham House at 115 Morrison Road.
Moved by Councillor Duddeck
Carried
That the Director of Planning Services be authorized to grant draft plan approval to the Draft Plan of Condominium (24CDM-23007/1716) submitted by Biddington Homes Lakeshore Inc., and prepared by J.H. Gelbloom Surveying Ltd., dated February 12, 2024, subject to the conditions contained in Appendix ‘A’ of the Planning Services report dated February 20, 2024.
Moved by Councillor Duddeck
Carried
That the Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment applications by MacDonald Rose Inc. for 358 Reynolds Street (File Nos. 24T-23003/1613 and Z.1613.65) be refused as proposed; That if the application is appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal, town staff be authorized to negotiate and finalize a settlement of the appeal, if possible addressing the concerns outlined in this report affecting zoning regulations and development standards to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Community Development and Town Solicitor or designates; and That the notice of Council’s decision reflect that Council has fully considered all of the written and oral submissions relating to these matters and that those comments have been appropriately addressed.
Moved by Councillor Haslett-Theall
Carried
That this meeting proceed beyond the hour of 10:30 p.m.
Moved by Councillor Duddeck
Carried
That comments from the public with respect to the proposed town-initiated Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendments (File No. 42.15.62 and 42.15.63), be received. That analysis of the following matters of interest to Council be included as part of the recommendation report: clarify the role of the Private Tree By-law and applicability. clarify how designated heritage buildings and heritage districts are considered. clarify how density in the Official Plan is different than units required to be achieved for the purpose of the Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF) program, and the number of persons living in a unit. clarify between lodging houses (lodging units) and additional dwelling units. provide a jurisdictional scan on the up-take of 4 units per property as-of-right in other municipalities. clarify how parking will work. clarify how infrastructure and servicing capacity is considered. clarify if the federal and provincial governments are developing their own lands for housing, if any. determine if the province will be advancing 4 units per property as-of-right. clarify how HAF monies are allocated, and on what requirements. clarify the timing of the approval of the town’s HAF application by CMHC. clarify what other municipal by-laws there are to regulate impacts from such as noise, property standards, parking, etc. clarify the census data and person-per-unit in Oakville, including the number of people that could occupy dwelling units. clarify who is eligible for rent
Moved by Councillor Chisholm
Carried
That the property at 530 Carson Lane be removed from the Oakville Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest; and, That, prior to demolition, the property owners allow for the salvage of materials from the house.
Moved by Councillor McNeice
Carried
That the following recommendation pertaining to Item 4.1 of the Heritage Oakville Advisory Committee minutes from its meeting on February 27, 2024 be approved and the remainder of the minutes be received: 4.1 Heritage permit application HP005/24-42.20R 27 Reynolds Street – construction of a new second storey rear addition and ground floor staircase That Heritage Permit Application HP005/24-42.20R for the construction of a new second storey rear addition with ground floor staircase at 27 Reynolds Street, as attached in Appendix B to the report dated February 13, 2024 from Planning Services, be approved subject to the following: That final details on the windows, doors, trim, cladding materials and paint colours be submitted to Heritage Planning staff for final approval; That this heritage permit expire two years from the date of final approval by Council.
Moved by Councillor Knoll
Carried
That this committee rise and report.
Moved by Councillor Elgar
Carried
That the report and recommendations of the Committee of the Whole be approved.
Moved by Councillor Longo, seconded by Councillor Grant
Carried
That the by-law(s) noted above, be passed.
Moved by Councillor Knoll, seconded by Councillor Adams
Carried
That a notice of intention to designate be issued under section 29, Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for the Daymond House at 2366 Carrington Place. Planning and Development Council Minutes March 4, 2024
Moved by Councillor Duddeck
Carried
1. That comments from the public with respect to the proposed town- initiated Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendments (File No. 42.15.62 and 42.15.63), be received. 2. That analysis of the following matters of interest to Council be included as part of the recommendation report: a. clarify the role of the Private Tree By-law and applicability. b. clarify how designated heritage buildings and heritage districts are considered. c. clarify how density in the Official Plan is different than units required to be achieved for the purpose of the Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF) program, and the number of persons living in a unit. d. clarify between lodging houses (lodging units) and additional dwelling units. e. provide a jurisdictional scan on the up-take of 4 units per property as-of-right in other municipalities. f. clarify how parking will work. g. clarify how infrastructure and servicing capacity is considered. h. clarify if the federal and provincial governments are developing their own lands for housing, if any. i. determine if the province will be advancing 4 units per property as-of-right. j. clarify how HAF monies are allocated, and on what requirements. Planning and Development Council Minutes March 4, 2024 k. clarify the timing of the approval of the town’s HAF application by CMHC. l. clarify what other municipal by-laws there are to regulate impacts from such as noise, property standards, parking, etc. m. clarify the census data and person-per-unit in Oakvil