Planning and Development Council

That this meeting proceed into a Committee of the Whole session.

That the following recommendation pertaining to Items 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 of the Heritage Oakville Advisory Committee minutes from its meeting on September 21, 2021, be approved and the remainder of the minutes be received: 4.1 Heritage permit application HP041/21-42.20D 69 Dunn Street – Construction of two accessory buildings That Heritage Permit Application HP041/21-42.20D for the construction of two new accessory buildings at 69 Dunn Street, as attached in Appendix B to the report dated September 14, 2021 from Planning Services, be approved subject to the following: That final details on paint colours, windows, doors, trim and cladding be submitted to Heritage Planning staff for final approval; and That this heritage permit expire two years from the date of final approval by Council. 4.2 Heritage permit application HP044/21-42.20S 55 Second Street – New cabana structure That Heritage Permit Application HP044/21-42.20S for the construction of a new cabana structure at 55 Second Street, as attached in Appendix B to the report dated September 14, 2021 from Planning Services, be approved subject to the following: That final details on the natural stone material be submitted to Heritage Planning staff for final approval; and That this heritage permit expire two years from the date of final approval by Council. 4.3 Heritage permit application HP045/21-42.20W 180 William Street – New cabana structure and landscaping That Heritage Permit Application HP045/21-42.20W for the construct

That the property at 164 Douglas Avenue be removed from the Oakville Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest; and, That, prior to demolition, the property owner allow for the salvage of historic materials from the house.

That the property at 4022 Fourth Line be removed from the Oakville Register of Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest; That staff be authorized to negotiate and finalize the terms of a heritage easement agreement with the property owner to ensure the history of the area is commemorated within any future development of this site to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning Services and Town Solicitor or designates; and, That the Town Solicitor be authorized to discharge the heritage easement agreement from title, at the expense of the owner, once the requirements in the agreement have been satisfied to the satisfaction of the Manager of Policy Planning and Heritage.

That the draft cultural heritage landscape conservation plan for 1042 Sixth Line, as attached in Appendix A to the report dated September 28, 2021, be approved.

That the report titled Neyagawa Urban Core – Background and Preliminary Directions dated September 21, 2021, be received. That Council endorse the Study Area boundary for Neyagawa Urban Core (NUC) Review. That staff undertake additional analysis and consultation regarding the NUC area and the development of an Area Specific Plan and subsequent town-initiated Official Plan Amendment for the Neyagawa Urban Core, and report back at a future meeting of Planning and Development Council.

That the Director of Planning Services be authorized to grant draft plan approval to the Draft Plan of Condominium (24CDM-21003/1413) submitted by Trafalgar Heights Inc., prepared by KRCMAR, dated March 8, 2021, subject to the conditions contained in Appendix ‘A’ of the Planning Services report dated September 28, 2021.

That staff be authorized to proceed in the appeals in Ontario Land Tribunal file # PL200333 in accordance with the recommendations of the report from the Legal Department dated September 28, 2021.

That the report from the Legal Department dated September 28, 2021 be received.

That the public meeting report, prepared by the Planning Services Department dated September 21, 2021, be received. That comments from the public with respect to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application by 2266 Lakeshore LP, File No.: OPA.1728.66 and Z.1728.66, be received. That analysis of the following matters of interest to Council be included as part of the recommendation report: what is an appropriate form for a gateway in this location? use of the POPS, operational matters and programming. look at adequacy of ATMP and TMP as it relates to this area. is the building designed such that it limits shadowing? timeframe for evaluating the proposal, and how does it compare to all of the applications currently in circulation? what type of affordable housing is being considered through the development proposal? full analysis of the policy context (at provincial, regional, and local level). investigate adjacent building heights for comparative purposes. look into best practices for how to handle parking (including ratios) compared to transportation.

That By-law 2021-124, a by-law to make housekeeping modifications to Zoning By-law 2014-014, as amended, as directed by Council at its January 27, 2021 meeting, be passed. That notice of Council’s decision reflects that Council has fully considered all written and oral submissions relating to this matter and that those comments have been appropriately addressed. That in accordance with Section 34(17) of the Planning Act , no further notice be required.

That this committee rise and report.

That the report and recommendations of the Committee of the Whole be approved.

That the by-law(s) noted above be passed.

1. That the public meeting report, prepared by the Planning Services Department dated September 21, 2021, be received. 2. That comments from the public with respect to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application by 2266 Lakeshore LP, File No.: OPA.1728.66 and Z.1728.66, be received. 3. That analysis of the following matters of interest to Council be included as part of the recommendation report: a. what is an appropriate form for a gateway in this location? Planning and Development Council Minutes October 4, 2021 b. use of the POPS, operational matters and programming. c. look at adequacy of ATMP and TMP as it relates to this area. d. is the building designed such that it limits shadowing? e. timeframe for evaluating the proposal, and how does it compare to all of the applications currently in circulation? f. what type of affordable housing is being considered through the development proposal? g. full analysis of the policy context (at provincial, regional, and local level). h. investigate adjacent building heights for comparative purposes. i. look into best practices for how to handle parking (including ratios) compared to transportation.

1. That By-law 2021-124, a by-law to make housekeeping modifications to Zoning By-law 2014-014, as amended, as directed by Council at its January 27, 2021 meeting, be passed. 2. That notice of Council’s decision reflects that Council has fully considered all written and oral submissions relating to this matter and that those comments have been appropriately addressed. 3. That in accordance with Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice be required. Planning and Development Council Minutes October 4, 2021